The lack of biodistribution studies for any of the three vaccines given they used a new delivery vehicle (mRNA) - Telling everyone the injection remains local and disappears from your body quickly; it only creates antibodies to the spike protein introduced to paraphrase the message being given early on.
The unblinding of the control group only six months in. They gave the vaccine to the placebo receivers in the study under the guise of their concern for their lives (yeah, right, thanks for being so considerate, Pfizer!).
The now-known censoring or memory-holing of any contrarian science, opinions or evidence against the vaccines by big pharma, mainstream media, governement and social media.
It's becoming evident COVID hospitalization numbers are in question given they were lumped together whether COVID was a primary or contributing cause, or just present.
The shaming of people who brought up the elephant in the room - obesity as a major comorbidity with diabetes and hypertension.
Not even acknowledging natural immunity to those who had COVID before a vaccine was ready, and then shaming them as anti-vaxxers.
And for those who keep saying they are safe and effective, the long-term safety cannot be asserted until we are 4 to 7 years down the road from the first vaccine, BUT big pharma unblinded their study's control group early on, compromising the process of a long-term blind study.
The likelihood of a bipartisan, non-performative committee is basically nil.
I mean, how else can one best hide their poor track records by slipstreaming one vaccine into others with also dubious track record.
It’s political theater, meant to provide sound bites for media and fundraising efforts.
I’m all for investigating vaccine efficacy and safety, but Congress is not the body to perform such investigations. And I mean both the House and Senate, not just one or the other.
On the other hand, is everyone going to trust an investigation done by Congress? I mean, if both sides endorsed the results, then maybe...
