So.. you're saying this specific technology can only get us 60-70%[1] of the way to the "ultimate end goal". Ergo... it shouldn't be deployed and we should whine about it on HN?
No, that's silly. Build the panels. Build the solar. Fix the externalities, but absolutely pick the low hanging fruit. Every panel on a hippie's home means less total joules needed elsewhere.
To be blunt: the kind of argumentation you engage in is absolutely toxic, and HN is awash in it. Engineers love to scream about perfect solutions, but real engineering is about tradeoffs. And folks here are absolutely terrible, just really, genuinely shit-tier, at discussing them rationally.
[1] Depending on locale, obviously. In e.g. Arizona it's probably much closer to 80-90%