undefined | Better HN

0 pointsBurningFrog3y ago0 comments

Something like 97% of all jobs have been eliminated since the Industrial Revolution started ~250 years ago.

And instead of the 97% unemployment our intuition tell us would happen, we're instead 30x as productive.

The same will happen when/if AI makes writing software far more effective.

0 comments

> … instead of the 97% unemployment … we’re instead 30x as productive.

Economic productivity simply means output per worker. So, we could make 97% of the US population permanently unemployed tomorrow, and as long as the AI replacement labor yielded equal or greater proceeds to the remaining 3%, we’d see a colossal increase in “productivity.”

That would be in the interest of the 3% to do (or attempt), which is what makes the scenario so scary.

comfypotato3y ago

But that’s never happened in the past. Why should it happen now? The Industrial Revolution is used as an example because it was the biggest spike in productivity, but the general trend has been the same since the invention of tools. Agriculture, another perfect example, lead to others having time to produce things instead of hunting/gathering. It’s easy to grasp with the agriculture example that “unemployment” wasn’t even really a risk.

Sure, there will be niche sub-industries that will be erased by LLMs, and people who have those niche skills will suffer. This has always been the case with technological advances. And always, it has not disrupted the economy.

pixl973y ago

> Why should it happen now?

What are S-curves.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse