https://chess24.com/en/read/news/the-7-most-illegal-chess-mo...
> I decided to interpret that as ChatGPT flipping the table and saying “this game is impossible, I literally cannot conceive of how to win without breaking the rules of chess.”
Kind of sounds like anthropomorphization, but more likely the author just papering over the glaring shortcomings to produce a compelling blog post.
It also sounds like the illegal moves were rather frequent. The 61-legal-move game sounded like an impressive outlier.
But ye, he is anthropomorphizing alot ...
Yeah, I'm "class C", weak amateur chess player, but I think you're grossly underestimating the amount of study I put into this game. I'm not going to make an illegal move
I guess most players would mess up 20/30 moves in.
I suspect you can't either, you can try by turning on blindfold mode on lichess and seeing how far you get.
Also people forgetting they moved the king/rook and trying to castle.
This article stated the opposite, gpt-4 couldn't play chess while gpt-3.5 could. So this is a case where the model got dumber.
