undefined | Better HN

0 pointssebzim45003y ago0 comments

ChatGPT did forfeit whenever it made an illegal move, read the article.

0 comments

No, the writer arbitrarily decided to interpret illegal moves as resignations in order to support the conclusion they wanted. That's very different and grossly unscientific.

mynameisvlad3y ago

I mean, that's more lenient than the official "interpretation" (rule) which is that your second illegal move results in a forfeit.

epups3y ago

This is not a scientific paper, and I at least find this decision justified, as he could have been more lenient and grab headlines with a bigger ELO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

swatcoder3y ago

No, the writer arbitrarily decided to interpret illegal moves as resignations in order to support the conclusion they wanted. That's very different and grossly unscientific.

mynameisvlad3y ago

I mean, that's more lenient than the official "interpretation" (rule) which is that your second illegal move results in a forfeit.

epups3y ago

This is not a scientific paper, and I at least find this decision justified, as he could have been more lenient and grab headlines with a bigger ELO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse