Qxd7 early on was puzzling but has been played in a handful of master games and it played a consistent setup after that with b5 Bb7. Which I imagine was also done in those master games. But interesting that it went for a sideline like that.

It played remarkably well although a bit lacking in plan. Then cratered in the endgame.

Bxd5 was strategically absurd. fxg4 is tactically absurd. Interestingly they both follow the pattern: Piece goes to square -> takes on that square.

This is of course an extremely common pattern, so again tentatively pointing towards predicting likely sequences of moves.

Ke7 was also a mistake but a somewhat unusual tactic with Re2 and f5 is forced but after en passant the knight is pinned. This tactic does appear in some e4 e5 openings though. But then the rook is on e1 and the king never moved or if it did, usually to e8, not e7. Possibly suggesting that it has blind spots for tactics when they don't appear on the usual squares?

Fascinating stuff.