The Obidient camp may have the better candidate, but this part of their case is just grasping at straws.
The only thing that should matter in the end is the determination of whether enough rigging occured to change the outcome of the election.
There's a world of difference between, "let's eat, Timmy," and "let's eat Timmy."
The first is perfect at the dining table while the second is inevitable when you're stranded on a raft out at sea [0].
https://www.onelegal.com/blog/dont-write-wrong-10-million-la...
Everybody took great delight when Austin ended up on the dinner table.
The drama in trying to convert election PDFs to Spreadsheets - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35272227 - March 2023 (137 comments)
What is the spirit of the constitution? Why are there general elections?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presiden...