> you need the human to figure out when that's the case.
Yes, but you will need fewer people. And thas is with the current level of GPT. If the GPTs proficiency increases, fewer and fewer people will be needed. That’s a problem.
Try and reframe the same argument except with computers to see that it doesn't add up. When computers started becoming widely spread you could've easily made the same argument. It isn't a problem, it's a boon to make our lives easier.
