Eh, I think AGI is still science fiction
The real question I have is 1) how close are we to human replacement AGI levels, and 2) even if we don't get full AGI, how much of a societal shakeup is going to occur with what we have.
We are already at the point of digital development that the argument of "We dont have AGI" is mostly meaningless. We need to have discussions at a societal and legal level on what we're going to do to prepare our lives for it occurring sooner than later to avoid catastrophic consequences.
We have been replacing humans for a long time, with animals, machines, computing, robotics and now some limited AI.
I can't answer about how much of a shakeup it will be. I fully expect the world to get worse as time passes. Enjoy things while they last.
> We are already at the point of digital development that the argument of "We dont have AGI" is mostly meaningless. We need to have discussions at a societal and legal level on what we're going to do to prepare our lives for it occurring sooner than later to avoid catastrophic consequences.
I agree with discussions on societal and legal level to reduce impact of technology on humans, but I fully expect those discussions to go nowhere and catastrophic consequences happening either way.
