undefined | Better HN

0 pointssdfghswe2y ago0 comments

> Now, I definitely prefer the US's stance of a password being illegal self-discrimination

Is that true though? Never heard that before.

0 comments

It's somewhat up in the air. The prevailing theory is that the 5th protects against compelling what amounts to testimony... but it's only been tested a few times in court, never by SCOTUS. With mixed results.

sdfghsweOP2y ago

Is there a way I can learn more about this? A resource for non-lawyers.

P_I_Staker2y ago

btw, I think OP meant incrimination

sdfghsweOP2y ago

I understood what he meant, and in fact I even missed the typo until you pointed it out.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointssdfghswe2y ago0 comments

> Now, I definitely prefer the US's stance of a password being illegal self-discrimination

Is that true though? Never heard that before.

0 comments

NoMoreNicksLeft2y ago

sdfghsweOP2y ago

Is there a way I can learn more about this? A resource for non-lawyers.

P_I_Staker2y ago

btw, I think OP meant incrimination

sdfghsweOP2y ago

I understood what he meant, and in fact I even missed the typo until you pointed it out.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse