Show HN: Tiniest Scheme Interpreter (opens in new tab)

(programmercam.posterous.com)

10 pointsc4m14y ago7 comments

7 comments

Personally, I am not a fan of these lookma-my-interpreter-in-zero-lines stuff. Take a look at http://norvig.com/lispy.html. Bigger, but well engineered.

zura14y ago

Yes, I'd prefer more exotic stuff like Scheme-to-C compiler written in Prolog or any other combination, not bounded by nbr of lines.

c4mOP14y ago

Thanks for the feedback guys! I intend to do more interpreter/compiler projects so perhaps you will end up considering one of my future projects sufficiently interesting or exotic :)

ElliotH14y ago

I'm not entirely sure this is valid. I'm happy to be shown that I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem to support environments meaning that you couldn't implement define, making it essentially not a scheme interpreter.

I'd be impressed by an actual implementation of R5RS in a small line count, but this just seems to be a calculator with lambda expressions and lists.

c4mOP14y ago

Thanks for the feedback. It does support environments - if you check the source code it refers to environments as 'scope'. It is not possible to properly implement lambda without implementing environments.

mst14y ago

"I just learned language X, look at how I can fail to implement lisp in more lines of X than the original mccarthy code took to actually implement lisp" really just isn't relevant here.

I'm glad you're learning python. I'm glad you're enjoying it. I'm glad you managed to write something that you think is within spitting distance of lisp with it.

But there's no need to post it to HN. Wait until you've done something actually interesting.

motxilo14y ago

There is no need to be rude, mst. If people don't consider such submissions interesting, they simply won't vote them up.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

7 comments

motxilo14y ago

Personally, I am not a fan of these lookma-my-interpreter-in-zero-lines stuff. Take a look at http://norvig.com/lispy.html. Bigger, but well engineered.

zura14y ago

Yes, I'd prefer more exotic stuff like Scheme-to-C compiler written in Prolog or any other combination, not bounded by nbr of lines.

c4mOP14y ago

Thanks for the feedback guys! I intend to do more interpreter/compiler projects so perhaps you will end up considering one of my future projects sufficiently interesting or exotic :)

ElliotH14y ago

I'd be impressed by an actual implementation of R5RS in a small line count, but this just seems to be a calculator with lambda expressions and lists.

c4mOP14y ago

mst14y ago

"I just learned language X, look at how I can fail to implement lisp in more lines of X than the original mccarthy code took to actually implement lisp" really just isn't relevant here.

I'm glad you're learning python. I'm glad you're enjoying it. I'm glad you managed to write something that you think is within spitting distance of lisp with it.

But there's no need to post it to HN. Wait until you've done something actually interesting.

motxilo14y ago

There is no need to be rude, mst. If people don't consider such submissions interesting, they simply won't vote them up.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse