undefined | Better HN

0 pointseesmith2y ago0 comments

"It makes sense" leads us back to the linked-to essay, which argues that live coding a solution to "arbitrary and unrelated topics like creating a script to handle scores for bowling or something equally irrelevant" do not make sense as a way to

If the evaluation doesn't make sense, then the conditions placed on the evaluation don't really matter.

Similarly, "assimilated the material" only makes sense if the live coding interview really does cover "the material". To use your analogy, measuring a football prospect’s cycling times aren't that good of a test of football playing skills. I mean, yes, there's some overlap, but there are more useful ways.

And one of the example tests was "handle scores for bowling", which is far from most work-related issues.

"consistent process that’s fair for everyone."

The author addressed this idea at several points, including "Any belief that a live coding interview is a consistently reliable way to make an objective assessment represents willful ignorance at best."

Picking a name out of a hat containing potential employee names is also consistent and fair.

Just because it's easy to measure doesn't mean it's an effective predictor.

0 comments

emodendroket2y ago

I suppose I fundamentally do not agree that the skills are unrelated. I think they are the same skills, but applied to a much smaller problem that fits in 45 minutes. The author does not make any case that the smorgasbord of alternatives he offers are any better. And none of this has to do with your “well I can just Google a well-known problem like this in real life so it doesn’t matter” argument.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse