The devs can change anything, it's just software. As long as miners, which are extremely centralized, agree it's the new chain.

I was a part of the bitcointalk forums in 2010 when the dev team created a soft fork that modified the blockchain to change consensus rules. THink about it, devs changed the consensus mechanism, that goes against everything bitcoin is supposed to be. They can do it again

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Value_overflow_incident

Awesome. That means that the fewer than 0.03% of wallet holders who hold more than 40% of the coins can own everything forever!

Also, it can. See the Ethereum fork and Bitcoin Segwit.

No one who has spent any time actually studying the price fluctuations in Bitcoin would ever believe that a fixed currency supply helps with stabilizing coins. Bitcoin itself is probably the best proof that fixed currency supply doesn't help with reducing currency volatility.

Which is a not necessarily a good thing. Deflationary assets are not conducive to being used as currency.

We already see some currencies that are valued differently based on the current situation and who holds it, what's the difference with BTC? What safeguards it has that prevents such discrimination?

BTC is highly volatile and its price is sensitive to voluntary (“at will”) trading.

Yeah, I prefer my currency to be valued by Twitter hype.

It can be created at the will of the developers of the software and their ability to influence the community.

Plenty of times the market value of Bitcoin has dropped drastically because one person said or did something.

I'd like to have what you're smoking.