No, of course not. But there is a difference between whether it is "okay" in some moral sense, and whether society deems it "okay", and whether it's normal/possible/desirable/etc for that to take time to change.

Replace "trans people" with something you hate in your arguments, and you can see that they apply equally well.

"sure, you and your reactionary gender normative compatriots"

Please don't assume you know anything about my view. I was careful not to express a view, but here you label me with one, in a fairly pejorative way.

That is not okay, in any way, shape, or form. If you want to know my view, then ask. You'd apparently be surprised to learn that i have spent lots of time and energy trying to help trans folks.

You really do keep missing the point, and appear very focused on how you feel about this particular thing. Other people feel equally powerful but opposite. You do simply define them as wrong. They do the same thing to you!

Your logic is actually the logic deployed to serve horrific ends, and i'm really not sure why you don't see it.

You claim you are not defining others as wrong, but you are in fact doing it, right here:

"Just don't take it to the point where you're trying to exclude people from your workplaces. Because that's fucking awful."

See here you've defined people who exclude trans people as wrong (again, i happen to agree if you really must know). I presume it is fairly fundamental to your beliefs, based on how hard you argue here.

But take people who believe the complete opposite of you - militantly (i don't care whether it's about trans people or anything else). That logic you just use applies equally well to that horrific end. Do you think these militantly opposite people should be excluded from their workplace? Do they get to think that you should be excluded because they think you are fucking awful? If not, why?

Because your logic applies equally well there - because, as i said, it is the logic you are using that leads to a horrific end.

Most people i talk with about excluding militantly transphobic people say "yes, i'm okay with"

Which I agree with, but not simply because i define the other side as wrong.

Now, as for what will happen, in practice, society will, over time, likely decide it's okay to not hire people who are transphobic, the same way society is okay not hiring all sorts of people that society does not agree with. Because that's what society is - a community and grouping, and a society always defines the acceptability bounds for the group. But changing those bounds takes time, and always takes time.

In the meantime, society is not sure where it stands, and will be okay with lots of things it will not be okay with in the future. That is, again, normal, and IMHO, hard to avoid. Even if it is pretty horrific for those involved. As mentioned, it doesn't seem like we've ever been able to successfully avoid it.