undefined | Better HN

0 pointsSymbiote2y ago0 comments

The National Curriculum (applies in England and Wales) for history:

> aims to ensure that all pupils:

> - know and understand the history of these islands as a coherent, chronological narrative, from the earliest times to the present day: how people’s lives have shaped this nation and how Britain has influenced and been influenced by the wider world

> - know and understand significant aspects of the history of the wider world: the nature of ancient civilisations; the expansion and dissolution of empires; characteristic features of past non-European societies; achievements and follies of mankind

You should have covered from the stone age right through to "Britain’s place in the world since 1945". The Romans, military and royal family are part of that.

None of that says you must approve of Roman Britain, the military or the royal family.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curricul...

0 comments

rcarr2y ago

I can only speak for my experience but there was little discussion of events elsewhere in Europe, let alone the rest of the world, with the exception of very significant events involving the UK military such as the world wars or the withdrawal from India and even they were told from a very UK centric viewpoint.

Quite frankly, I think learning about say the conquistadors, the Ottoman Empire, the Portuguese empire, asian history etc and how that has gone on to shape the world we have today would probably be of more use than the amount of time spent dissecting the personalities of past monarchs.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse