undefined | Better HN

0 pointsDropInIn2y ago0 comments

You do have rights regarding issues of libel and slander, which seem to be the acts Reddit staff engaged in according to the description the user provided. (The language implies explicit acts in public intended to cause harms)

Really, y'all need to stop this stuff. You scare people from action and so things only get worse.

0 comments

ceejayoz2y ago

Absolutely nothing in the linked article rises to the level of libel or slander, as far as I can tell. Perhaps it's hiding behind "I don't want to publicly share the details".

(Unless you're referring to the situation with Apollo's developer and the recorded conversations. That might. Maybe.)

DropInInOP2y ago

Follow the thread back to the preceding comments.

The topic ain't what's in the article, it's what the user says they experienced...

Right?

ceejayoz2y ago

The user won’t say what they experienced. “reddit retaliating against me” could encompass anything from “they gave me a flair that said ‘poopy head’” to “they sent assassins to kill me”. Some of that spectrum is legal, some isn’t.

Lots of mean, bad things are still entirely legal.

2 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsDropInIn2y ago0 comments

Really, y'all need to stop this stuff. You scare people from action and so things only get worse.

0 comments

ceejayoz2y ago

Absolutely nothing in the linked article rises to the level of libel or slander, as far as I can tell. Perhaps it's hiding behind "I don't want to publicly share the details".

(Unless you're referring to the situation with Apollo's developer and the recorded conversations. That might. Maybe.)

DropInInOP2y ago

Follow the thread back to the preceding comments.

The topic ain't what's in the article, it's what the user says they experienced...

Right?

ceejayoz2y ago

Lots of mean, bad things are still entirely legal.

2 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse