s := []string{"hello", "world", "foo", "bar"}
fmt.Println(s) // [hello world foo bar]
s = s[:0]
fmt.Println(s) // []
s = append(s, "XXX")
s = s[:2]
fmt.Println(s) // [XXX world]
Which will print back "XXX world" because it's using the same array, and nothing was ever "deleted": only the slice's length was updated.This is why "delete(slice, n)" doesn't work and it only operates on maps.
I suppose clear(slice) could allocate a new array, but that's not the same behaviour as clear(map) either, and doesn't really represent the common understanding of "clearing a slice". The only behaviour I can think of that vaguely matches what "clearing a slice" means is what it does now.
I think I understand now why `clear` can't work on slices the way I think it should, but only because slices themselves don't work the way I feel even stronger that they should.