> Again, accidents happen, but if you are the catalyst over and over again it's on you.
Technically, it "is on" whoever objectively plays a role in the underlying causality.
You "may" be referring to your perception of what is going on, as opposed to what is actually going on (which is unreachable).
>> This seems objectively reductive and represents ideological beliefs as objective facts.
> No, you just didn't liked that thing you like got attacked for the thing they did and are making up excuses.
Except I have the ability to describe the various ways in which it is (at least plausibly) objectively reductive and represents ideological beliefs as objective facts, whereas you have a much harder problem: proving that you can actually read my mind (or, are omniscient).
