You can start a site and say what you want. You aren't entitled to have a wide audience. If no one wants to broadcast or read what you say, too bad.

You want me to leave because I hate censorship?

Read what I wrote again and pay closer attention, I don't care what you do, the question is if you care about the censorship on the site you are posting on now.

"If you don't like America, then leave."

I never said that, I asked why you were using a heavily censored site while being against censorship.

Not all discourse turns to "Nazism"

I also never said this, read again. You can look at voat, slashdot, zero hedge and 4chan knockoffs, and there is tons of nazi spam along with other terrible stuff that people don't want to read and sites don't want to broadcast.

If people don't want to broadcast it and other people don't want to ever see it, but you allow it anyway, that drives away users. No one is going to allow that on a site they control. You can go make your own site but you aren't entitled to an audience.

The ideal social media system is a p2p protocol that nobody can exert undue control or influence over.

That's been done and it gets over run with spam if people can message other people without explicitly connecting first.

My argument stands.

You didn't actually make an argument and you didn't back anything up with evidence at all. You just said you wanted big sites to not have any moderation.