Good enough for me
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36519942
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36522471
And to a lesser extent:
One of those substances is alcohol, and this place sold drinks.
Also she was a smoker at the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_65_list...
I'm for banning artificial sweeteners. Something always told me that you can't get away with having a thing that tastes like sugar but doesn't exactly act like it to the body without some wrong thing happening. Either the taste reaction to the body has to do something strange (tastes like sweet so let's react the same way we would to sugar but oops this isn't sugar so now we're all out of whack) or yeah, something like this where it's carcinogenic.
Now mind you I'm not some wacko who is also against MSG and "chemicals". I also understand that some of the population needs alternatives to sugar. But some of these need full unbiased rigorous testing in humans. What do these things do to our bodies and how do our bodies react to them?
Come on, now.