> Control of the .ML domain will revert on Monday from Zuurbier to Mali’s government, which is closely allied with Russia. When Zuurbier’s 10-year management contract expires, Malian authorities will be able to gather the misdirected emails. The Malian government did not respond to requests for comment.
Oops.
> Lt. Cmdr Tim Gorman [...] said that emails sent directly from the .mil domain to Malian addresses “are blocked before they leave the .mil domain and the sender is notified that they must validate the email addresses of the intended recipients”.
I think the issue is people sending emails from personal accounts that the DOD cannot control. The article also mentions travel agents as another source of the email.
then make it part of any contract that if you do business for .mil, and you use microsoft/zoho/gsuite etc, that they automatically run a set of ".mil compliance settings" overlaid onto your tenant.
Given what can be figured out by collecting thousands of hotel itineraries or whatever is actually being leaked here, it may just be the DoD needs to crack down and expand the definition of what is considered sensitive.
The military should move to domain that is safer from typosquatting, by controlling a bunch of related TLDs.
Or continue not caring about spying on random unclassified information.
It seems like a better approach would be to harden all email software in usage to ban almost-but-not-quite .mil at the end of email addresses, looking for the above permutations client-side before anything is transmitted.
Because I can see some serious shortcomings in your proposal right off the bat...
Also, not only did they set up something specifically to capture the emails that they knew weren't intended for them (incidentally preventing the senders' own SMTP servers from alerting the senders of the problem almost immediately), but... it sounds like they also examined the content of some of the diverted emails that they knew were sensitive and not intended for them.
I can't tell from the article whether they've finally disabled this diversion of the emails. Nor whether they had a plan to scrub all copies of the emails before it's out of their control, maybe offering US diplomats/officials a deadline to get a copy if they want it
Also, if they're now acting in good faith, and interfacing with US officials, I wonder who leaked this situation to the press, and why.
Whether that'll take the form of a software engineering solution or a "social engineering" solution - in the form of Congressional hearings and the like - remains to be seen.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
navy.ml. 300 IN MX 0 handle.catchemail.ml.
army.ml. 300 IN MX 0 handle.catchemail.ml.
Very unethical way to handle sensitive data.- Presumably each typo led to one leak. "Typos leak emails" would be more appropriate in that case.
- Are they really "US military emails" if they originated from elsewhere and one of the intended recipients was on the '.mil' domain? Apparently "emails sent directly from the .mil domain to Malian addresses are blocked before they leave the .mil domain".
But let's be real...There's a difference between having unsecured packages on your doorstep and sending packages to another address entirely.
The current title implies that its a single keystroke misconfiguration that is causing this when instead it's lots of people just not typing the e-mail correctly.
That said, this is the original title and it makes sense to me—it's a single typo repeated many times over.
Update: missed the part that this is incoming emails problem from non military.
> He said that emails sent directly from the .mil domain to Malian addresses “are blocked before they leave the .mil domain and the sender is notified that they must validate the email addresses of the intended recipients”.
One of the examples is a hotel booking confirmation, which would come from a third party.
The article states "closely allied with Russia" and the current establishment desires to punish anyone who doesn't distance themselves from Russia. The emails might be nothing sensitive to the state but they can just lie and say "Mali is deliberately intercepting emails meant for the military". Well that wouldn't even be a lie because someone did set up something to catch emails going to dot-ml which were meant for dot-mil.
A nice war helps also helps with elections at home.
Mali has been close to Russia politically, culturally, economically, and militarily since the 1960's.
Mali's welcomed Russian troops, including Wagner's, in the wake of the French pulling out.
"[The Russian involvement in Mali] signals a major expansion of Russia's military interests in Africa and a strategic setback for the West. The deployment of Russian military contractors signals a profound break with France and the West."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-58751423
https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/un-security-council-end...
https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/12/russias-presence-mali-r...