A world where I can't tell if something is made by human or by machine is a world that has been drained of something important to me. It would reduce the appeal of all art for me and render the world a bit less meaningful.
You don't see the writing on the wall? OK, here is a big hint: it might make a huge difference from a legal perspective whether some "photo" showing child sexual abuse (CSA) was generated using a camera and a real, physical child, or by some AI image generator.
The upshot of which is, the useful writing assignments I used to give as homework will either have to be done in class (wasting valuable class time) or given up altogether (wasting valuable learning experiences).
If your students want to betray themselves of the possible learning opportunities of attempting to formulate the sentences by themselves in English, it is their problem.
The same holds in mathematics (degree course): of course, in the first semesters, you can use a computer algebra system like Maple or Mathematica for computing the integrals on your exercise sheets, but you will betray yourself of the practice of computing integrals that these exercise sheets are supposed to teach you.
And as a teacher who really WANTS them to learn and to get that feeling, "Hey, I can actually do this!", it's depressing to think of the one who do cheat themselves. Oh well...
I think you could pick up right quick on who understood what they wrote, and who didn't.
They once said I should join Line then we can all talk, then I asked if it's possible to talk in groups of 200+ and their eyes got really big.
