It's a pretty slimy move, at the very least.
I'm not saying that worldcoin isn't bad, but my time is literally my life. If I could make as much money selling my biometric data as I do working, I'd rather do that instead.
So it seems to me that the crux isn't that people sell biometric data, but that they don't make enough off it.
"Sorry Kenyan, I know you'd like to make 50 dollars (or whatever it is) by selling your biometric data, but JohnFen/Kenya government/Western Media thinks you're too poor to get any money for voluntary transactions."
That's not my stance at all. My stance is that if you're leveraging an extreme power differential to get people to do things that they would not otherwise be willing to do, you're being coercive.
Worldcoin and these people are not engaging in a free exchange as equals.
why does their government need a parallel, competing financial system that it doesn't control? by now even the US has banned most crypto exchanges.