If they strip all attribution, then you can just take them to court for violating the license; other than public domain and WTFPL, even the most permissive licenses (BSD/MIT/Apache) still require attribution.

Free software has been fine without any businessmen or companies involved, we don't need your or any company's approval. It seems like the only thing that will vanish from the open source sphere are companies with flawed business plans.

Building a business off the open source model and community good-will before realising it doesn't work is either incompetence or dishonesty.

> If that's what you think open source is, it'll vanish. No commercial system can exist like that and it should not because it effectively means distributing resources from people who do everything to people who do nothing.

This is a weirdly hyper-capitalist take. You're saying that the successful businesses built off open source "should not" exist?