This seems sort of out-of-character for Jobs, who had a reputation of being sort of an intense, uptight weirdo.
As to the advice itself - “do I want to have a beer with this person” is why our industry looks like a dude rodeo and has led to some of the most incompetent, myopic, nepotistic teams I’ve ever had the misfortune of working with. “Does this person bring skills, talents, and perspectives we currently lack” is a better question. “Does this person look at things in a different way to the rest of the team, so as to help us spot things we otherwise wouldn’t” is a very good one as well. But “would I have a beer with this person” is going to give you people who don’t challenge you and is going to lead you to wonder why your org can’t seem to hire anyone except mid-20s white dudes.
Pretty sure this is not a legitimate story.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Steve+Jobs%22+%22Beer+Tes...
Tbh, it kind of made sense in consulting when you had a lot of traveling to do, spend time in middle of nowhere towns with your colleagues and hours at an airport when your flight was delayed. And I say kind of, because it instantly became a bros club and because consulting doesn’t really require any skills beyond being that person who you’d have beers with.
Coming back to Steve Jobs and the corporate bs, this kind of test makes absolutely no sense. You need pilots who can fly a plane, not have beers with you. You need surgeons who can do the impossible surgeries, not the dude who can tell the best jokes over beer. You need the engineers who can build products, not frat boys you can do shots with.
- Former frat boy consultant who absolutely hated it
It's always funny to see this kind of example come up in stories about Jobs.
Contrary to whatever the specific example is intended to convey about him, this was clearly a _torturing_ issue for Jobs himself, at some level. It was not generally easy for him to open up OR relax, not by a long shot.
His personality is (broadly) similar to Tucker Carlson's, notably bouncing around this perpetual public image dichotomy of "pr*ck vs gentle guy".
So, there are just piles, even veritable _mountains_ of disturbing experiences. Wow what a jerk! Etc.
Between which, in the details you get these funny but oddly-affecting moments where you may just realize that the _aspirational_ self for these people _themselves_ is, in fact...
...somebody you'd want to have a beer with [0].
I sympathize, but it's too bad this issue is so easily talked around in its complexity.
(There's also a fascinating counterpart you can get with Mister Rogers-types, who will occasionally reveal a rather brutal tendency toward being rudely controlling toward various people in their circle, etc. Those guys are like, "relaxing or having a beer is nice...but have you ever been really intensely... EFFECTIVE?")
Or just that once someone has gotten through the level of screening needed to get 1:1 time with Jobs, the "beer test" is mostly a sanity check.
For better or worse, that's why there are coding tests (for example), because likeability and competence are orthogonal traits and you can't assess the latter from the former.
I worry about the potential for figuring out someone’s age or just if someone doesn’t drink.
I will never forget being offered a beer in an interview before I was 21. I refused without stating my age (I still got the job) but it was a bit of an awkward situation. For the record this was a tech job.
It probably depends on the industry and company but, in general, alcohol in a lot of professional contexts is probably less, ahem, free-flowing than it once was. Dinner, cocktails, maybe the odd social hour but not in conjunction with an interview otherwise probably.
We all know he did do acid.