On the contrary, what you can see in the Zapruder film is comletely consistent with the bullet trajectories lining up. [0]

This documentary I watched recently is long, but it puts all the eyewitness testimony of Oswald in the depository building into one big spacial timeline [1]. There are some inconsistencies (like you would expect when aggregating a bunch of eyewitness testimony from fallible humans) but there's nothing there that made me think there was something nefarious going on. Anything specific you had in mind?

As far as the autopsy photos go, I know the photo you're referring to, and you're misinterpreting it.

Here are some medical illustrations [still kinda graphic, but not photographs] of the part that "exploded out" [2] and what the actual hole in the back of his head looked like when you held that part back in place [3]:

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AlKUJHXYxQ&t=260s [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AlKUJHXYxQ&t=260s [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HSCA-JFK-head-7-125.jpg [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JFK_posterior_head_wound....

> But you can see from video evidence that they were sat aligned and Connolly was not turned.

I just looked up the Zapruder film right now [1]. In the seconds before the fatal shot, you can clearly see Connolly turn around to face JFK (you can see the rotation of the shoulder pretty clearly as the car passes the road sign). At the moment of the fatal shot, he appears to be in the middle of turning back to his original position. Now I can't tell from the Zapruder film whether or not they were aligned or instead offset by several inches, but it is very clear that Connolly was not facing forward at the time of fatal shot.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBJFT-OyDEc is the source I used.

The autopsy of Kennedy shows small wound in the back of head, top and side blown off, and no wound in the front. The bullet fragments were in his head, which makes a forward shot impossible. The video is deceptive because it is from behind and doesn't see full explosion.

Oswald was a good shot, he was rated sharpshooter and marksman in the Marines. Lots of people left to watch the motorcade. Memories are always unreliable. Oswald was supposed to be working.

It is possible that FBI was working from bad info or incompetent. It was thought that the last two shots were rapid fire. But there is better info now that the shots were spaced out with plenty of time for bolt action rifle, and the "rapid fire" was echos. Lots of people have recreated the shots, some not that good shots.

What you are saying is that most people are able to deduce proper bullet trajectories through soft targets by watching a single section of film shot from a distance -- and that this ability is so good as to render all of the other evidence moot.