Which is what you wrote.
As it’s hard to find a company that doesn’t at least attempt tactics like this named in the complaint (or much worse), it seemed to leave the implication clear.
They deserved to have the law applied because you felt it was unfair.
Feel free to read the code, sections 1 through 7.
It says ‘in restraint of trade or commerce’. But how is Google restraining trade or commerce in a way any different (or even more than!) a broadcaster getting exclusive rights to broadcast the Olympics for instance? And how is that not Unfair too?
[https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1]
Section 2 makes it illegal to Monopolize or attempt to Monopolize - but never defines it.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2
None of the other sections seem interesting.
In law the general definition of monopoly covers so many markets, and is also based on ‘unreasonable’ efforts to restrict competition. Reasonable is doing a lot work here, as that can go pretty far!
[https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/monopoly]
So what law exactly do you think they are breaking and why? Are they taking unreasonable steps to prevent others from competing with them? If so, what would be reasonable for them to do instead?
