undefined | Better HN

0 pointscjrp2y ago0 comments

Call it "The Public IPFS DHT v1.0" then ;)

0 comments

Because that wouldn't be confusing if a novel implementation named itself "The Public IPFS DHT v2.0"?

Specificity >> descriptiveness, when you're aiming for a distributed future with multiple parties

As much as I hate AWS' jungle of names, I get why they did it. And it's probably better than any alternative

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointscjrp2y ago0 comments

Call it "The Public IPFS DHT v1.0" then ;)

Because that wouldn't be confusing if a novel implementation named itself "The Public IPFS DHT v2.0"?

Specificity >> descriptiveness, when you're aiming for a distributed future with multiple parties

As much as I hate AWS' jungle of names, I get why they did it. And it's probably better than any alternative

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse