undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjddj2y ago0 comments

> Have you built your own minigpt?

No, but did follow along to an Andrej Karpathy video along those lines at the beginning of the year.

I didn't want to make a judgement on any kind of superiority, or that LLMs simulate brains, or anything of that nature. Just wanted to question why these elements (namely intelligence and reasoning) strike the nerve that they do.

The anthropomorphism argument is case in point, really. It poses the accusation that the other side is imparting human qualities to a machine, without needing to touch on what makes those qualities human or why that matters in the first place. It is, ironically enough, flawed reasoning.

0 comments

unblough2y ago

> Just wanted to question why these elements (namely intelligence and reasoning) strike the nerve that they do.

“Just asking questions” is a meme of the unscrupulous.

I think you are unfairly lumping those who believe in human exceptionalism with those cynical of the economics of such claims.

It’s okay, to me, for people to be ignorant of what llms are. What a dismally bland existence if everyone were just llm experts.

What strikes a nerve with me is the people financially incentivized to do so are leveraging the terror, both the awe and fear interpretations, of those ignorant of the tech.

> The anthropomorphism argument is case in point, really. It poses the accusation that the other side is imparting human qualities to a machine, without needing to touch on what makes those qualities human or why that matters in the first place.

This reads as circular reasoning. Those claiming the opposite are also failing to define what those qualities are.

Anthropomorphism is a real thing. I can flinch in pain for the sake of my couch when a friend jumps onto it, but that hardly provides, without me needing to define human pain explicitly, an opportunity for said friend to respond with the absurd claim that human pain is in fact couch based.

jddjOP2y ago

I'll concede the just asking questions point, that much is true.

GPT4 appears to give more intelligent responses than GPT3. To describe that, though, perhaps we need to migrate to a term that doesn't step on the toes of those who, though not human exceptionalists, rather just feel that (these particular?) machines don't happen to suit measurement in such human domains as intelligence.

Of cause, the ship has sailed and they're fighting a lost cause. There's little reason to dig for new words. It's the I in AI and it has been for longer than many here have been alive.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse