> If those points under "Nature of the Action" are merely points raised by Twitter, how can I trust them?
You see Elons side and evaluate their followup. You follow the back and forth and evaluate who has the stronger argument.
When it gets to the point that the judge is literally reprimanding Elon Musk's council for breaking rules and shenanigans, you start buying TWTR and short selling TSLA.
You're grossly overcomplicating this. You don't come up with arguments in a trial, that's the lawyers jobs. Your job as a reader is simply to pick out the side with the better argument.
-------
If you are worried about form, that's not your job. That's the judges job. And if you are worried about not understanding the complete argument, that's not even your job. That's the opposing lawyers job to make a cohesive and full argument.
At this stage of the trial, it's simply reading.
