undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnemetroid2y ago0 comments

They did introduce a mandatory CLA which allows for using the code in non-GPL ways, even noting that this was the purpose of introducing the CLA.

https://github.com/audacity/audacity/discussions/932

0 comments

LWinterberg2y ago

Indeed:

> Audacity's source code is currently released under the GNU General Public License version 2 (GPLv2). We intend to update the license to GPLv3 to enable support for new technologies not compatible with GPLv2 (i.e. - VST3, which is compatible with GPLv3).

VST3 is dual licensed with some Steinberg license and GPLv3. The purpose of the CLA was to be able to migrate Audacity binaries to GPLv3 with VST3 support. This has happened as of Audacity 3.2.

Other uses for the CLA are to publish the thing in app stores down the road. It's not stopping Audacity being open source, unless you consider Apache software not open source.

nemetroidOP2y ago

Migrating to GPLv3 and publishing in app stores was clearly not the only purpose. The linked page says as much.

> The CLA also allows us to use the code in other products that may not be open source, which we intend to do at some point to support the continued development of Audacity.

I am well aware that you're allowed to do this with permissively licensed code, too.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse