Show HN: AssistantHunter, a GPT that searches through 9K+ GPTs for your task (opens in new tab)

(chat.openai.com)

11 pointstxu2y ago8 comments

There will probably be over 1M GPTs by the end of the year, so I built a search engine for GPTs.

It's built with GPT custom actions and qdrant.

We're accepting new GPTs, please submit yours at assistanthunt.com.

Enjoy building!

8 comments

etewiah2y ago

Disappointing not to see anything listed yet.

My approach is to list a few already even as I am building the functionality for the site:

https://gipeties.com

Functionality I am currently working on: - curation - ranking - discussion

txuOP2y ago

that's a good approach. haha

jruohonen2y ago

> There will probably be over 1M GPTs by the end of the year, so I built a search engine for GPTs.

It will be interesting to see how many of these will survive. A hypothesis: not many. Thus, what I find more interesting is the business model OpenAI is trying to push.

txuOP2y ago

Hey jruohonen, great point. it depends on what does "survive" mean.

Monetize-able GPTs? Not many for sure. What will happen IMO is established companies will build official GPTs to better serve existing customers.

GPTs for personal use? Many GPTs will be abandoned and not be used by anyone. That's okay for one-off use cases.

There will be a loooooong tail of GPTs that people would use from time to time. There will be a lot of diversity but the top GPTs will eventually be like the top apps in the app store IMO.

jruohonen2y ago

> Monetize-able GPTs? Not many for sure. What will happen IMO is established companies will build official GPTs to better serve existing customers.

Care to elaborate whether the supposed plan is again a classical two-sided market setup (i.e., OpenAI et al. monetize the companies using their models and the companies then monetize their users)?

Obscurity43402y ago

Even though AI is getting more advanced, it seems like there's an inverse relationship between time and value. Where is the equilibrium going to be reached or plateau in a way that is sustainable to the providers and users?

firedup2y ago

How do you source them, google?

txuOP2y ago

google is the main source. also there are some github repositions and reddit links.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

8 comments

etewiah2y ago

Disappointing not to see anything listed yet.

My approach is to list a few already even as I am building the functionality for the site:

https://gipeties.com

Functionality I am currently working on: - curation - ranking - discussion

txuOP2y ago

that's a good approach. haha

jruohonen2y ago

> There will probably be over 1M GPTs by the end of the year, so I built a search engine for GPTs.

It will be interesting to see how many of these will survive. A hypothesis: not many. Thus, what I find more interesting is the business model OpenAI is trying to push.

txuOP2y ago

Hey jruohonen, great point. it depends on what does "survive" mean.

Monetize-able GPTs? Not many for sure. What will happen IMO is established companies will build official GPTs to better serve existing customers.

GPTs for personal use? Many GPTs will be abandoned and not be used by anyone. That's okay for one-off use cases.

There will be a loooooong tail of GPTs that people would use from time to time. There will be a lot of diversity but the top GPTs will eventually be like the top apps in the app store IMO.

jruohonen2y ago

> Monetize-able GPTs? Not many for sure. What will happen IMO is established companies will build official GPTs to better serve existing customers.

Care to elaborate whether the supposed plan is again a classical two-sided market setup (i.e., OpenAI et al. monetize the companies using their models and the companies then monetize their users)?

Obscurity43402y ago

firedup2y ago

How do you source them, google?

txuOP2y ago

google is the main source. also there are some github repositions and reddit links.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse