They probably preach that because they never saw land expire in decades, but they've seen money expire a few times.

If you buy forest or agricultural land you are pretty safe. The worst thing that can happen in civilized places is that a big entity forcefully buys it away from you for "reasons" and you don't get as much profit as you would like, but nonetheless then you can just buy more land somewhere else. Owning developed land is just a liability in many places since you've got to pay taxes and all kind of annual fees. It's business at that point and not just owning land (your business instincts don't have to be nearly as good when dealing with forest and agricultural land).

A 1% land tax expires the land in 100 years.

Expire !? For example, let's think about a solid basic land reform, and every owner now has to pay 5% of the immobile-value on it, as an annually tax.

And after twenty years i don't have paid the debt for an apartment or house, two-times?

But, sure so americans try to sell us houses builded from; chipboard, insulating wool, plasterboard and roofing cardboard?

i am questioning this... in terms of: "money was to last longer than the expiring and perishable things" and "The real estate bubble created by low interest rates"

Cos for me it seem that it ignored grief and "people" for -to be objective something the OP named "interest", i won't sound offending but it seem to be a mistake (both..all three...)

regards...

edited: sry "alittlebut" i mistaken you for the op p-: