The intended meaning is that in each game, a set of red, green, and blue cubes is taken out of the bag, replaced, another set is taken out, and so on until the game ends. I think the example can be understood in the meaning that all sets listed for the game are taken out and replaced as a group. That is, these are mutually exclusive subsets of the bag's contents. The example only shows games that are strictly valid or invalid for both interpretations. It didn't show a game that had individually valid sets but a sum of some color that exceeded the maximum. For example,
Game N: 4 red, 5 blue, 4 green; 3 green, 2 blue, 7 red; 2 blue, 8 red
would require at least 19 red cubes by my initially understood meaning, and only 8 red cubes by the intended meaning. The misunderstanding can be disproved from the part 2 description, but I was on part 1 at the time. The phrasing of the rationale for invalidating games 3 and 4 in the example perhaps leans towards the intended meaning, but subtly.
That was actually really clear to me. It clearly says the whole thing happens multiple time per game, where the thing includes "put them back in the bag". There are also examples.
To play, please identify yourself via one of these services:
[GitHub] [Google] [Twitter] [Reddit]Surely someone on HN is capable of gritting their teeth here, and understands that Eric doesn't want to have to set-up a whole account and e-mail verification system.
I got some serious Zelda: Tear of the Kingdom vibe reading this !