Just put this line:
sed -i "s/CDDL/GPL/g" META
in the prepare() section of the PKGBUILD.
This will use the in-kernel FPU functions for cryptography and other things like raidz calculations that got EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL'ed later if the original plumbing is still in the codebase. It's probably not offically recommend and I'm not sure how much these codepaths are tested anymore but I assume that quite a few people that don't need to redistribute anything but need the performance use a hack like this or something similiar. It works fine for me.
Personally I lost a ton of respect for the Linux kernel developers after introducing that kernel fpu EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL thing and backporting it to all kernels and Linus badmouthing ZFS and somehow assuming Oracle is still involved in OpenZFS which is mostly FreeBSD and some sponsors spread out over the world but not related to Oracle.
The USL vs BSDi litigation over BSD ultimately came down to a handful of source files out of 18000. ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Berkeley_Soft... )
I wouldn't talk badly against ZFS, but I would not roll any dice with Oracle as a copyright holder.
I've never done this type of work, but probably will in the future now that I have an example to follow.
Sometimes it takes quite a while before those two are in sync and you can upgrade your system.
I’m still using ZFS on LUKS2 for now, given the issues like this. (You also can’t specify multiple keys in ZFS native encryption.)
There is also discussion about using ZFS on LUKS in the same thread: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/6824#issuecomment-1819...
There is a PR out for this: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/15588
This config we find is the answer. I lean into neovim this time, today, because it’s all a lessons. And then we type update, and it’s all okay!”
The thing he humbly leaves out is “why aren’t you an arcolinux fanboy yet!?”
I’m an arch contributor, your’re barking up the wrong tree.
It looks like a bot post, from the time before AI generation actually became good. The post appears like random disconnected concepts are just thrown together with no clear context or relevancy to the topic of debugging ZFS.
