undefined | Better HN

0 pointsMenhirMike2y ago0 comments

Yes! The worst is that even if you set up all kinds of reports etc. on what you expect, if the backup runs for weeks/months successfully, you just stop paying attention and then when something fails, you won't notice it.

I do think that file systems that support snapshots - like ZFS, but I think LVM can be used for stuff like ext4, and Apple APFS does too - is the way to go. Not sure how well NTFS's Shadow Copies/Volume Shadow Service work, I heard horror stories, but not sure if those are one-off freak accidents. Probably worth considering ReFS anyway these days on a Windows Server. But with a Snapshot, you're at least insulating yourself mostly from changes to the data you're backing up. At the expensive of managing snapshots, that is, getting rid of old ones after a while because they keep taking up space.

0 comments

MenhirMikeOP2y ago

(Edit: Though a snapshot of the file system isn't enough if you need to back up services that are currently running. E.g., a database server might have stuff uncommitted in memory that wouldn't be captured by a file system snapshot. But database backups are their own beast to wrangle.)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsMenhirMike2y ago0 comments

0 comments

MenhirMikeOP2y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse