> You have now changed that to only legally require that user information not be sold for profit to third parties

TL;DR it’s about illegalizing a business model that is based on users who are not paying customers. It’s not about forbidding any specific app or service. That’s the difference. The rest is nitpicking.

How you illegalize that model is another question. Forbidding double-sided market may be a good way of doing it. As long as it leaves honest market-compatible business model the only option.

> I'm not sure I would dignify "selling user information to third parties for profit" with the term "business model"

It is nearly a business model of ad-based social media.

Anyway, it is not where the problem is. I have said many times, the point is illegalizing the double-sided market of ad-driven social media where millions of users are not paying customers and there is no competition as a result.

Forbidding the sale of user data would be a completely natural next step, but that’s orthogonal. Even if it is legal, when there is competition you can just switch to another provider if you are unhappy that your data is being sold.

We are not adding anything by rehashing the same thing over and over in this conversation.