Scott Forstall sells 95% of his vested AAPL shares
With a subtitle:
... because he's in line to get 5x more shares in the future
He sold 64,151 shares but by 2016 he will have 250,000 restricted stock units that are vested.
Maybe he was simply trying to balance his asset allocation. He's definitely not living off $40m, right? It always seems that Apple is sure to outperform, but maybe we'll look back on this as a genius move in a few years.
EDIT: Updated the title to richardburton's suggestion.
"An Apple CEO-in-waiting sells 95% of his company shares"
I am heavily invested in Apple and so I follow them very closely. Data from Asymco gives me even greater confidence in their performance:
http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Screen-Shot...