I think that there can be an error rate that is low enough to still be very useful and a net-positive for the economy. But if there is a small chance to just end the company on the spot, then no one will use it despite the benefits. So how can we have the good parts without the bad, this is my question.
I guess the onus is on people to prove that using AI specifically is somehow a net-positive for the economy because that's in no way a given. But I don't feed good about Air Canada trying to make that case.