undefined | Better HN

0 pointsJustsignedup2y ago0 comments

The other comment mentioned how google didn't even acknowledge why they did it.

I have to say, talking to AWS and GCP, the AWS marketing, onboarding, and support arm are far far far far far superior to google's. In fact they are so far apart that our management has blatantly discarded google as even an option for moving our infra over because of how terrible our interactions have been. I'm all for de-throning the king, but it ain't gonna be done by the court jester.

In any case, point is, AWS has good strategy where it matters most.

0 comments

jnaina2y ago

Agreed. Court jester is the correct phrase, as GCP are complete clowns. Some of the stories we know of, from our customers, about GCP's conduct and lack of any semblance of professionalism are shocking. MSFT/Azure on the other hand, are formidable and worthy competitors in the cloud space, against AWS.

pm902y ago

Can you give specific examples of what was lacking? Ive only had positive experiences with GCP.

JustsignedupOP2y ago

We want to migrate to it:

"Okay cool! We'll sign you up! Good luck!"

"We have a migration strategy, and partners who can help you lift-and-ship or at least consult to get you a lay of the land. Try these companies and see if you're interested, and we'll help you along the way."

Google is -- thanks for reaching out, you can certainly sign up and figure it all out, here's a few books!

Amazon -- things are complex, and here's a few books to read, but I know you don't have a few years so here's some people who know how to do this, and we've ironed out how most companies succeed in migrating. Also he's a ton of incentive to move to amazon-exclusive services.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse