"Experimental" traditionally means "if you use it and it breaks, then that's your fault". This is because if <experimental thing> did break, the entire internet would dogpile on any complainers with "IT WAS LABELLED EXPERIMENTAL WHAT WERE YOU EXPECTING."
It's the same as ignoring Kickstarter warnings; if a project gives you a warning then tell you to ignore that same warning, don't; if things go to shit then everyone will say "YOU WERE WARNED WHAT WERE YOU EXPECTING." They cannot un-warn you, that's not how this social situation works. I'm not claiming this is fair, I'm just claiming this is how it plays out in practice.
The only safe response to this is to assume that anything labelled "experimental" is exactly what it says. And to be clear, that means the only safe response is to ignore any claims that the thing labelled "experimental" is safe.
Or to put it another way: if you don't mean it's experimental and do recommend it to the average user, then don't use the term "experimental".
