I've seen people who went from no-meat -> meat and back to no-meat, so it's your anecdotal experience versus mine.

Give me an authoritative source and then we can have a discussion about the science behind it, if not we are just stuck in this discussion that won't lead anywhere, I've just challenged your anecdote, I have not said it's not true for some people, I have not diminished your experience but it's your experience...

> There is something to it.

There might be but I don't want to live in a world where anecdotes count as authoritative source for anything, it's a signal, not a conclusion.

Again, I'm glad for your experience, just don't try to peddle it as enlightenment.

And lastly, there's no way for the whole world to be able to support to eat as much meat as you are proposing, it's simply not possible, so perhaps understanding what mechanism might be behind these anecdotes so the people who can benefit from it have access to their necessities rather than pushing it into as a general truth that won't be sustainable with current technology, it's a disservice to you and others in your situation to push meat-eating as a cure-all for everyone, it is not.