> the suggested solution is a theoretic or academic solution which we theorize might work out some day, but is not currently a realistic solution for the need to provide food for artists to eat so that they could remain alive.
These are all your words, not theirs. They didn't suggest this at all.
> The fact that you disagree with the explanation due to ideological purity reasons is not grounds for downvoting it.
This is true, but:
1) I didn't downvote it (I literally can't)
2) There are other good reasons to downvote it, such as what I linked.
Unless you have something more to say about cyrpto I think we should leave this here.
