undefined | Better HN

0 pointstwo_handfuls2y ago0 comments

The argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

0 comments

How much do you want to pay for zero/negative emissions?

reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

LOL. Don't get offended.

You know that's not my question, and you also know I represented the author accurately (See "forget o&g")

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointstwo_handfuls2y ago0 comments

The argument says “emissions reduced”, not “full electrification.” And reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

How much do you want to pay for zero/negative emissions?

reducing emissions is cheaper than destroying the world we live in.

LOL. Don't get offended.

You know that's not my question, and you also know I represented the author accurately (See "forget o&g")

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse