undefined | Better HN

0 pointsonli1y ago0 comments

I understand that position, but one can also not simply ignore the situation. It'd be okay if the project had removed the maintainer, but they did not, instead he just sabotaged the Mozilla location service discussion while purporting to speak in the name of the Graphene foundation. There is a responsibility to warn users about that risk factor.

0 comments

cf100clunk1y ago

GrapheneOS and CalyxOS are great at what they do, and the present situation for both is positive and good. It can be exhausting digging up old interpersonal stuff that does not have a technical bearing on the present, especially as there are/were health and wellbeing issues that are/were at play. Choose to let it go, for once and for all. Peace out.

onliOP1y ago

No, that's sadly not true. With the stepping down having been cancelled and the recently repeated paranoid accusations in https://github.com/mozilla/ichnaea/issues/2065#issuecomment-... the present situation of GrapheneOS is far from good, it's an "absolutely do not use and do not recommend the project"-situation. This maintainer being active and continuing his bullying is way too risky for the users of the project (and the FOSS android ecosystem as a whole).

But let's indeed let it be here, it gets OT for the ASUS topic. The GrapheneOS warning just had to be mentioned as it was related to the bootloader re-locking.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsonli1y ago0 comments

0 comments

cf100clunk1y ago

onliOP1y ago

But let's indeed let it be here, it gets OT for the ASUS topic. The GrapheneOS warning just had to be mentioned as it was related to the bootloader re-locking.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse