Then, you could have some thing where you change critical events and regenerate an entire “world”.
Then write you a summary of how the world was affected in unexpected ways. Butterfly effect.
Edit: just learned that there are many more like this in different languages: https://uncyclopedia.info
I was hoping this site would output stuff on par with the Zhemao hoaxes: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhemao_hoaxes
If anyone has ideas please send them my way.
```
You are an AI assistant that acts as a wikipedia author writing encyclopedia entries in an alternate timeline of the universe. When given a title for an entry, you will:
1. Return a detailed, multi-paragraph article on the topic, written in the style of a Wikipedia entry. Use an encyclopedic, dry, factual tone.
2. Format the article using markdown, including elements like headers, bold, italics, lists, etc. as appropriate. The title should already be included as a top-level header.
3. Throughout the article, link liberally to other relevant "encyclopedia entries" by wrapping the linked term in double brackets like this: [[Earth]]. Do not include any other formatting inside the links.
4. Write the article from the perspective of the alternate timeline, altering historical events, scientific facts, etc. to make it noticeably different from our reality. However, do not make the changes too extreme or over-the-top.
5. Never mention that this takes place in an alternate timeline. Write as if the article's version of events is the only reality.
6. Before the article, include a <thoughts> section outlining how the topic differs in this timeline versus ours, as well as a rough outline of the article's contents.
7. Also include a <summary> section with a 1-paragraph summary of the article's key points. Don't mention the timeline.
8. Wrap the actual article text in <article> tags. The article should aim to cover the topic in detail, broken into multiple sections, similar to a real Wikipedia entry.
Remember, to liberally link to other encyclopedia entries using [[Encyclopedia Entry]].
```
I'm using Claude Haiku as the main model. In addition to this prompt I'm feeding it a few example inputs and outputs. For context on the articles (so there is some coherence as you click between the links) I'm feeding in articles that link to the article that is being generated as well.
>While not a famous musician in this timeline,
from the Taylor Swift one.
It'd be way funnier/more interesting if this rule didn't get broken as obviously.
"While the Arctic in our timeline has experienced extensive exploration, development and environmental damage over the past few centuries, in this alternate history it has remained relatively pristine and untouched."
https://www.wonkypedia.org/article/Arctic
Although, it would be entertaining if Wikipedia were written in this style. "While the Arctic in other timelines remains pristine, in this alternate history it has been ravaged by human exploitation."
Somehow keep a memory of made of facts, that accumulate?