And, whose car is it? Mine, or Musk's? If I bought it, it better be mine. If it's Musk's, he can pay for it. But if it's mine, it better not be running some non-car-related workload on its computers without my permission.
Maybe. What that will turn into is like smart tvs: pay extra to avoid this "feature".
They'll be serving you ads first, I bet.
Tesla has smart people, just like any tech company, but they're not uniquely smart and they're not immune to the same short-sighted thinking that plagues other tech companies.
Note that I think this particular idea is not necessarily bad for the company, it's just not anything special. It's basically Folding@Home, monetized. If you can convince enough people to leave it on (or force it on and somehow avoid legal/PR issues) then I guess you can save a tiny bit of money on certain kinds of workloads.
here's an even more inconvenient truth for you, and this one is short enough to embroider on a pillow : "it's not what you know, it's who you know."
The jury is out.
Anyway, there's nothing mysterious about the success potential of being a grifter. If it weren't so, the world would have far fewer grifters in it.