undefined | Better HN

0 pointsCodeCompost1y ago0 comments

Didn't see the video but doesn't that effectively mean that .NET was ported to DOS?

0 comments

.net 2.0 and later are highly dependent on windows and winapi. Parts of .net core might stand a better chance at being ported to DOS.

.NET 2.0 was fully implemented as Open Source by the Mono Project.

The most recent version includes quite a bit of Microsoft code and offers .NET 1.0 through 4.x

No. It relies on Windows 95 infrastructure. And it's not a modern .NET, but .NET Framework 2.0.

It is still maintained. You can use .net 2.0 on the latest visual studio if you choose to.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

.net 2.0 and later are highly dependent on windows and winapi. Parts of .net core might stand a better chance at being ported to DOS.

.NET 2.0 was fully implemented as Open Source by the Mono Project.

The most recent version includes quite a bit of Microsoft code and offers .NET 1.0 through 4.x

No. It relies on Windows 95 infrastructure. And it's not a modern .NET, but .NET Framework 2.0.

It is still maintained. You can use .net 2.0 on the latest visual studio if you choose to.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse