See my response to the other commenter. In these cases as well I would conclude it's very weak evidence of AGI, so I don't think we disagree.

Edit: I think maybe the disagreement here is about the nature of evidence. I think there can be evidence that something is AGI even if it isn't, in fact, AGI. You seem to believe that if there's any evidence that something is AGI, it must be AGI, I think?