Do the plugs have any real-world design flaws, or is this just gear snobbery? Can the author show that they're heating up too much? Given that there must be hundreds of thousands of home chargers, what's the incidence of problems caused by cheap 240 V plugs?
Design flaws? No. Limitations, yes.
A $5 NEMA 14-50R is designed for maybe a few dozen to a few hundred insertion cycles. They’re typically used for ranges (and other fixed equipment) that are plugged in once, and then unplugged once more when you replace the appliance. When the contacts wear out, gaps appear and arcs occur inside the device and it melts. Internal shorts can also happen inside the device. Here’s a tear down video of a residential NEMA 5-15R and a commercial NEMA 5-15R that illustrates some of the shortcomings of cheap wiring devices and shows how more expensive devices have a more robust design: https://youtu.be/kX6xnOksQTc
It could also be caused by not using a torque screwdriver to tighten the terminal screws, which is required by the NEC. You must tighten the terminal screws to the torque value listed in the wiring device instructions, and hold it there for 5 seconds. A loose termination can cause all sorts of nasty problems.
There are many grades of wiring devices meant for different applications. More $$ = more durable, better contacts, a full brass strap inside the device, etc.
Most people are unaware that multiple grades of wiring devices exist, and also unaware that it can be very important to use the correct one and also install it correctly which requires a torque screwdriver. This is why it’s a good idea to just pay an electrician to do it correctly.
Leviton sells a heavy duty NEMA 14-50R specifically designed for plug in EV chargers that are designed to handle many insertion cycles. It costs about $67, but that’s the wiring device you buy if you’re going to be doing a lot of insertion cycles.
https://store.leviton.com/products/50-amp-ev-charging-recept...
There’s no such thing as a NEMA 14-50R that isn’t rated for a 50A continuous load. It wouldn’t be UL listed if that was the case.
Probably some people have abnormal use patterns that have them moving a 220v charger around all the time, but I’d bet it’s highly unusual amongst EV owners who charge at home regularly.
Or set your car to only pull 24A from the outlet rather than full speed. Still more than fast enough to full charge overnight.
They're not required to weather your scrutiny or to pass your bar exam to be allowed to post whatever they want.
Aside from that, you raise good points, but you can very well ask your questions directly to the author using the comment section of their blog, you're somewhat more likely to get a satisfying answer there than here.
You're far more likely to see damage due to loose connections - either the wires are not fully secured to the outlet, or the plug is not fully seated & snug, both of which cause overheating.
> NEC 110.14 (D)
Tightening torque values for terminal connections shall be as indicated on equipment or in installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. An approved means shall be used to achieve the indicated torque value.
It's limited to home EV charging. This is one reason why given the choice between a NEMA plug source or a hard wired source (to circuit in Junction box), I would choose the wired source/circuit connection.
The plug manufacturers also know about the melted NEMA connector issue and are designing versions for continuous use at the higher price points mentioned.
(EDIT: sorry, yes, I meant 120V outlet)
One good test that I saw somewhere that I do on new outlets I am charging on, is leave the car charging for ~30 minutes and then quickly unplug the charger from the wall. Touch the prongs to your hands. If they are very warm or hot, you are likely over-drawing that outlet and need to ramp down your amperage draw (or better yet, find a new outlet).
This article focuses on outlets but the wiring is just as (or more) important and outlets can very easily be installed with under-code wiring.
The issue in the circuit ampacity for standard residential outlets - typically, a 120v 15 amp plug will be wired in 14 gauge NM-B wire (romex), which already de-rates the maximum temperature the wire jacketing is allowed to reach over higher ampacity wire (THHN) which is typically run in conduit. For a given wire gauge, THHN has more ampacity and the jacket is rated to a higher temperature.
for a 20amp 120v circuit (not common unless you install intentionally for that purpose) you need 12 gauge wire.
But, as mentioned in the article, continuous loads need to be up-sized because of temperature, and even standard outlets for the correct ampacity circuit don't often anticipate 100% duty cycle.
BUT, the real question is for your trickle charger, how many amps does it draw? if it tries to draw 12 amps on a 15amp circuit, everything is fine. If it tries to draw 15-20 amps on a 15 amp circuit, there is some danger. Many breakers (esp older ones) will not actually pop if the amp demand ramps up slowly.
Ampacity Charts: https://www.cerrowire.com/products/resources/tables-calculat...
Source: I've wired a LOT of power tools with big loads, but I am not an electrician. Take this advise as indicative and decide whether it warrants you contacting an electrician to validate your situation.
I wonder if the US National Electric Code allows this.
The OP is confusing load rating vs. capacity rating.
However, computed loads are always adequately under the breaker size, and beneath wire capacity, and below the receptacle rating, all three and each components of a circuit.
Many urban building codes often demand the 14-50R receptacle to match the 6/3 COPPER (not Romex) wire and 50A breaker size, often as a response to mass introduction of EV.
NEC 2018/2022 is unchanged about the permissible used of 50A-rated receptacle with smaller 40A breaker but NEC code firmly states that a breaker cannot exceed 8/3 AWG wire rated capacity and many types of 8/3 sheathing barely supports 50A; that's because NEC is all about load-rating, well beneath its rated capacity.
Naturally, in light of those NEC "restrictions", if an EV charger calls for a 50A RATED circuit (because charger performs at nominal load operation at 37A-ish, you'll want all three components of the circuit to each carry 50A. This is the part where the former electric stove/range 8/3 wire failed to meet the new EV charger's demand.
If the EV charger is rated for 60A but operates nominally at 46A, DO NOT go the 50A installaion route. Go with 60A. Operating your load capacity near its rated capacity is potential meltdown situation, especially if weather turns hot, Hot, HOT!
Also for 50A rated EV charger in the high-temperature area (garage), 8 AWG copper wire and 6 AWG aluminum wire are not NEC-code recommended despite having the 50 AMP to 60 AMP ampacity rating (NEC code); go with 6/3 copper.
For most residential garage having 50A-rated EV charger, that means 6/3 (non-Romex) copper AWG, 50A breaker, and 14-50R receptacle. Open-air carport and year-round cooler weather region can NEC-wise get away with (but local/urban electrical code may prevent) the use of 8/3 AWG copper (but no aluminum) wires.
A 50 amp rated outlet (backed by a 50 amp rated breaker, and wire capable of handling 50 amps) is fully NEC compliant if you run it for 40 amps continuously (80% derating) or 50 amps temporarily (which NEC defines as a load expected to continue for 3 hours or more). EV chargers fall under the 80% derating. I'm not aware of any EV charger that uses 37A. They either support 40A (80% of 50A), 32A (80% of 40A), or 48A (80% of 60A).
You are allowed to use 40A and 50A receptacles on a multi-outlet 40A circuit. You’re also allowed to use 15A and 20A receptacles on a multi-outlet 20A circuit.
Table 210.21(B)(3) of the NEC
